Hi Gotn O'Guts,
Thank you very much for your suggestion - and particularly for confirming I didn't miss anything, but that indeed it's not working the way I thought it would. Your suggestion is a helpful workaround since it avoids re-typing the field names.
Nevertheless, I thought this would be a solution to break down complex transformations into blocks/ sections, and combine them within a meta-transformation. Since that's not the case, I changed my design so the final step in the child transformation writes the results into a database so I don't need to read the fields in subsequent operators.
I'll still put in the feature request (thanks for the link) because I think it could be helpful.
Thanks again for your feedback, much appreciated,
Gert