When a storage administrator needs to compare the data loss risk of various storage system configurations
the only available / standard metric is MTTDL.
There are online tools for computing / comparing MTTDL for storage
system configurations that use conventional RAID groups. For example, the "wintelguy" site
has the raidmttdl.pl tool.
I need a tool that will allow me to compute MTTDL for a DDP backed HDP pool
based on selected raid_type, number of DDP-groups in the HDP pool ... etc
Example:
A. 1 HDP pool with the following 1 DDP group
24 drives, raid_type 14D2P
B. 1 HDP pool with the following 1 DDP group
24 drives, raid_type 6D2P
C. 1 HDP pool with the following 2 DDP groups
12 drives, raid_type 6D2P
12 drives, raid_type 6D2P
It would also be good to understand how the risks of DDP
compare to those of conventional RAID.
Conventional RAID allows admins to upscale spare capacity
(by defining multiple SPARE-DRIVES that can protect any RG in the system)
DDP does not appear to allow admins to define multiple SETS-OF-SPARE-CHUNKS"
So, it appears (qualitatively), on the surface, that DDP (and similar schemes from other vendors)
are somewhat less robust that conventional raid systems, in multi-drive failure scenarios.
------------------------------
Andrew Romero
HDSFC1159
------------------------------