HUR Performance Comparison: 64G Fibre Channel vs 25G iSCSI

As enterprises modernize their infrastructure to support data-heavy applications, the choice of storage connectivity becomes a key performance factor. Two common options are 64G Fibre Channel (FC) and 25G iSCSI over Ethernet.

Both deliver high-speed connectivity, but their performance differs in throughput, latency, and scalability. This blog compares the two technologies with real-world benchmarks across workloads with VSP One B28 array.

Pros & Cons: 64G FC vs 25G iSCSI

64G Fibre Channel (FC)

Pros:

• High performance: Faster than 25G iSCSI
• Ultra-low latency: Ideal for demanding, time-sensitive workloads

Cons:

• Higher cost: Requires FC HBAs, FC switches, and FC-enabled storage
• Less flexible: Limited to storage traffic; doesn’t converge with LAN

25G iSCSI (Ethernet)

Pros:

• Cost-effective: Leverages standard Ethernet NICs and switches
• Flexible & converged: Storage + LAN traffic can share the same network

Cons:

• Lower performance:  Lower performance than 64G FC
• Higher latency: TCP/IP and iSCSI overhead adds jitter and delays

Workload Performance Comparison:

This blog evaluates the performance of 64G Fibre Channel (FC) and 25G iSCSI with Hitachi universal replication (HUR) enabled across various workloads, including OLTP, VDI Full Clones, VMware Large Block, and VMware Apps, highlighting throughput differences for enterprise storage connectivity.

OLTP

This workload mimics the I/O profile of an Oracle database. It uses four constituent sub-profiles which are run together.

There are two iterations:

OLTP High Hits: 70% read and write cache hit rates

OLTP Low Hits: 30% read and write cache hit rates

Table 1: OLTP workload

Performance Comparison:

The OLTP HH workload achieved 28% higher throughput, while the OLTP LH workload delivered 59% higher throughput with 64G FC compared to 25G iSCSI.

Figure 1: OLTP High Hits 

Figure 2: OLTP Low Hits

VDI Full Clones

This workload mimics Virtual Desktop Infrastructure with:

10:1 deduplication ratio.

2:1 compression ratio.

Table 2 :  VDI Full Clones workload

Performance Comparison:

VDI Full Clones achieved 16% higher throughput with 64G FC compared to 25G iSCSI.

Figure 3: VDI Full Clones

VMware Large Block

This workload mimics an aggregated I/O profile of storage system running mostly VMware. It uses two constituent sub-profiles which are run together.

The following data reduction ratios are used for this workload:

2:1 deduplication ratio.

2:1 compression ratio.

Table 3: VMware Large Block workload

Performance Comparison:

VMware Large Block achieved 12% higher throughput with 64G FC compared to 25G iSCSI.

Figure 4: WMware Large Block

VMware Apps

This workload mimics four common VMware applications. Volumes are provisioned in sets of five: one Exchange, one OLTP, one SQL and two web volumes.

There are two iterations:

VMware Apps High Hits: 70% read and write cache hit rates

VMware Apps Low Hits: 30% read and write cache hit rates

Table 4: VMware Apps workload

Performance Comparison:

The VMware HH workload achieved 38% higher throughput, while the VMware LH workload delivered 87% higher throughput with 64G FC compared to 25G iSCSI.

Figure 5: VMware Apps High Hits

Figure 6: VMware Apps Low Hits

Copy Operations

Performance Comparison:

The Hitachi Universal Replication performance data shows 64G FC significantly outperforms 25G iSCSI in copy operations throughput.

64G FC delivers nearly double the throughput of 25G iSCSI in Initial Copy (IC) and 35%- 50% in Resync operations.

Even under active I/O load, FC maintains consistent performance, while iSCSI experiences a more noticeable impact during resync.

Figure 7: Copy Operation (without Host I/O) 

Figure 8: Copy Operation (with Host I/O) 

Test Environment

Test Environment 25G iSCSI:

Figure 9: Test environment with 25G iSCSI

Test Environment 64G FC:

Figure 10: Test Environment with 64G Fibre Channel

Comparisons: Configuration Details

Table 5: Configuration details comparison

Conclusion:

 64G Fibre Channel delivers 16–87% higher throughput and lower response times across diverse workloads.  64G FC significantly outperforms 25G iSCSI in copy operations throughput.

64G FC is the clear choice for performance, reliability, and mission-critical workloads. While 25G iSCSI is the choice for cost optimization, flexibility, and ease of integration with existing IP networks.